|
|
|
|
장혜영 ( Jang Hye-Young ) - 한양대학교 간호학부
송은옥 ( Song Eun-Ok ) - 한양대학교 간호학부
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of qualitative studies published in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (JKAN) and Asian Nursing Research (ANR) and to determine explicit suggestions to improve the quality of qualitative papers.
Methods: A total of 106 qualitative studies published in JKAN and ANR from 2008 to 2017 was reviewed using consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
Results: In the research team and reflexivity, there was a lack of description in relationship building with participants and for researcher assumptions. Regarding study design, pilot tests for interview guideline development and revision of a transcript for clarity were less reported than other items. For analysis and findings, descriptions of number of data coders and diverse cases were insufficient.
Conclusion: We suggest that researchers consider and describe COREQ items in more detail when reporting qualitative research. Also, although COREQ are guidelines for reporting qualitative studies, they do not reflect the characteristics of all such research methodologies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a systematic evaluation standard including questions reflecting the characteristics of each qualitative research methodology to contribute to improvement of qualitative research.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
질적연구, 간호연구, 면담, 포커스그룹, 분석
Qualitative research, Nursing research, Interview, Focus groups, Analysis
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|